BEATLES LET IT BE 50th DELUXE- WHAT'S NEW?

Bootleg audio discussion for anything John, Paul, George and Ringo
AdamBound
Posts: 532
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2021 2:03 pm
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 671 times

Re: BEATLES LET IT BE 50th DELUXE- WHAT'S NEW?

Post by AdamBound »

Hey Mike, when the Disney+ series comes out, can I do a “What’s New?” :lol: :lol:
Complete Twickenham Footage collection out NOW: viewtopic.php?t=7470
mikec
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:58 pm
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Re: BEATLES LET IT BE 50th DELUXE- WHAT'S NEW?

Post by mikec »

ToddS wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 5:14 am Thank You for telling us what is new and what is edited .
Thanks Todd
mikec
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:58 pm
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Re: BEATLES LET IT BE 50th DELUXE- WHAT'S NEW?

Post by mikec »

Lord Reith wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 8:05 am Thanks.

It annoys me a lot that they not only used the wrong For You Blue mix on Get Back, but got the stereo orientation wrong for the album. Even Glyn's advance acetates have the stereo the other way around.

This is the kind of thing that stops people buying official products. Because if you have to rejig the cd or lp to correct something, you can't listen to the original Apple version any more and so there's no point in having it. I probably would have bought the vinyl version just to have a real copy of the GB lp. But not with the stereo the wrong way round. :roll:
Yep, I think we all here agree with you. Thanks
mikec
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:58 pm
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Re: BEATLES LET IT BE 50th DELUXE- WHAT'S NEW?

Post by mikec »

BDJ wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 8:33 am Thanks for the excellent review!
Thank you very much BDJ!
mikec
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:58 pm
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Re: BEATLES LET IT BE 50th DELUXE- WHAT'S NEW?

Post by mikec »

glami wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 9:18 amGreat job!
Thank you
mikec
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:58 pm
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Re: BEATLES LET IT BE 50th DELUXE- WHAT'S NEW?

Post by mikec »

skynet wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:17 pm @MikeC - Your reviews are stellar as always, thanks for that :)

i will be honest with you guys

i will get the box, only for the multichannel mixes (the cd box) and for the Vinyl novelty of having the "Get Back" jacket in high quality (but i need to compare that with the jackets of my vinyl bootlegs of the album after) but other than that, i feel frustrated, in general by the butcher work that Apple did here with the session material, as well as in general with the stereo mixes which are for me obsolete when compared to the multi channel mixes (5.1 DTS and Dolby Atmos).

In a phrase: i couldn't care less about the content of this box other than multichannels and will keep my bootlegs thank you very much
Thanks!! And yeah, another butcher job done here.
mikec
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:58 pm
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Re: BEATLES LET IT BE 50th DELUXE- WHAT'S NEW?

Post by mikec »

rfwood1 wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 4:42 pm Thanks much for your work on this review. I think many of us will find it to be a valuable reference.
Thank you very much
dascottjr
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 5:43 am
Has thanked: 201 times
Been thanked: 27 times

Re: BEATLES LET IT BE 50th DELUXE- WHAT'S NEW?

Post by dascottjr »

I wouldn't say *everyone* is disappointed about "Get Back" not being a true v3 on this box. If anything, I personally consider it "Get Back v5: the official version" and will be enjoying it as such.
User avatar
BeatleGuy1949
Posts: 892
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:04 pm
Been thanked: 72 times

Re: BEATLES LET IT BE 50th DELUXE- WHAT'S NEW?

Post by BeatleGuy1949 »

Thank You for the info!!
wizz
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2021 12:31 am
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: BEATLES LET IT BE 50th DELUXE- WHAT'S NEW?

Post by wizz »

Would have been cool to include "Session Jam Part 1 & 2" from the 3rd January 1970 session. If indeed, if that's where it came from?
Post Reply