thanks a lot for the much improved sound!!
Harry And His Court Jesters
-
BeatleGuy1949
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:04 pm
- Been thanked: 70 times
-
firefoxnumber6
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2021 1:31 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Harry And His Court Jesters
Could I please request a re-up of this this, just missed it! Many thanks.
-
foolonthepill
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 10:19 pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Harry And His Court Jesters
A big thanks to Lord Reith for the effort to find better audio of this performance, for taking the time to upgrade it and for sharing it with the rest of us.
This is a major upgrade which I never thought existed and I am very happy for it.
You have again done a wonderful job.
Thanks again.
This is a major upgrade which I never thought existed and I am very happy for it.
You have again done a wonderful job.
Thanks again.
-
Lord Reith
- Posts: 4696
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:22 am
- Location: BBC House
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 4083 times
Re: Harry And His Court Jesters
Thanks guys. It very nearly didn't happen. The tape was labelled "Beatles Palladium" and then when the guy played it it turned out to be the RVP, so for a few days it was like "Oh damn, what a shame" until it suddenly occurred to me that it might be a line recording of the tv broadcast and not just a tape of a bootleg. Still kind of wish it had been the Palladium though... 
Like I said, thanks to our good friends who share the love with the rest of us. Nothing to be gained from keeping these things hidden.
Like I said, thanks to our good friends who share the love with the rest of us. Nothing to be gained from keeping these things hidden.
Women there don't treat you mean, in Abilene
-
silver_2000
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2023 4:30 pm
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 507 times
- Contact:
Re: Harry And His Court Jesters
the real question is what Palladium you were hoping for? 63 or 64, ?Lord Reith wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:57 pm Thanks guys. It very nearly didn't happen. The tape was labelled "Beatles Palladium" and then when the guy played it it turned out to be the RVP, so for a few days it was like "Oh damn, what a shame" until it suddenly occurred to me that it might be a line recording of the tv broadcast and not just a tape of a bootleg. Still kind of wish it had been the Palladium though...
Like I said, thanks to our good friends who share the love with the rest of us. Nothing to be gained from keeping these things hidden.
-
Lord Reith
- Posts: 4696
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:22 am
- Location: BBC House
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 4083 times
Re: Harry And His Court Jesters
Either would be just fine but 64 would be the bee's knees.silver_2000 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:08 pm the real question is what Palladium you were hoping for? 63 or 64, ?
Women there don't treat you mean, in Abilene
-
Yellowsubmarine
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2021 8:32 am
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 49 times
Re: Harry And His Court Jesters
The Palladium 1963 performance in such quality would be an incredible find.silver_2000 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:08 pmthe real question is what Palladium you were hoping for? 63 or 64, ?Lord Reith wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:57 pm Thanks guys. It very nearly didn't happen. The tape was labelled "Beatles Palladium" and then when the guy played it it turned out to be the RVP, so for a few days it was like "Oh damn, what a shame" until it suddenly occurred to me that it might be a line recording of the tv broadcast and not just a tape of a bootleg. Still kind of wish it had been the Palladium though...
Like I said, thanks to our good friends who share the love with the rest of us. Nothing to be gained from keeping these things hidden.