New Blue Soap - The MONO Edition [2022] - January 3rd Update
- dumbchops
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2021 2:31 am
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 32 times
Re: New Blue Soap - The MONO Edition [2022] - January 3rd Update
I guess for now to keep the peace I'll stick with the 2007 DDSI numbers but I can't entirely hold back my sincere belief that they need to be updated and corrected.
My full name is Uncle Capt. "Skipper" Dumbchops and I seem to have misplaced my electric pretzel sharpener.
- jpgrcat
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2021 3:33 pm
- Location: British Columbia
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: New Blue Soap - The MONO Edition [2022] - January 3rd Update
Hey Bud [Dumbchops], we know you're doing yout best
We all owe you a big thank you, for the research, etc
We all owe you a big thank you, for the research, etc
Huge Beatles Fan & collector Anything Beatles/Solo related,
which includes NEMS, Apple, Dark Horse, Ring'O, & MPL Labels
Beach Boys/Related, & The Byrds/CSNY/Related..& many other acts
which includes NEMS, Apple, Dark Horse, Ring'O, & MPL Labels
Beach Boys/Related, & The Byrds/CSNY/Related..& many other acts
-
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 3:49 am
Re: New Blue Soap - The MONO Edition [2022] - January 3rd Update
I recommended that too, especially if you wanna divide the long start and stop rehearsal tracks into smaller tracks to get to the better runthroughs. What makes the sessions seem more dull is when 4 or 5 runthroughs and false starts are crammed on a 11 minute or so track. Every time I did, people acted like PC and the DDSI are etched in stone. As for other people's comments, I see no problem with people having their own numbering systems. The more that people do, the better that someone will get it right.beatlesondvd wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 5:30 amIn order not to mess up the DDSI numbers when I happen to re-number some performances, I simply add a letter after the DDSI number: 3-343a, 3-343b, 3-343c, etc.dumbchops wrote: ↑Tue Mar 22, 2022 11:08 pm The confusion I can kind of blame on the whole DDSI numbering system as it seems to be outdated and personally the more I work with these tracks the more I just want to re-number and re-title it myself but that would of course be going against the tide. I'm standing at a crossroads here.
Re: New Blue Soap - The MONO Edition [2022] - January 3rd Update
Thank you so much for the update ! The 11.5kHz cutoff of the stereo edition always bothered me a bit, and to finally be able to hear the highs properly is a real pleasure! Thanks again for this set!
"I know what I like, and I like what I know."
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2021 9:05 pm
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 25 times
Re: New Blue Soap - The MONO Edition [2022] - January 3rd Update
Please excuse me if I've missed anything here (and thanks for your hard work here, it is much appreciated) - will there be more dates for the MONO edition?
Re: New Blue Soap - The MONO Edition [2022] - January 3rd Update
Renumbering just makes sense. Doug would if he were updating his book based on what is out there now. It's not like renumbering the verses in the bible.
- dumbchops
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2021 2:31 am
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 32 times
Re: New Blue Soap - The MONO Edition [2022] - January 3rd Update
I had a lot of fun making the "stereo" version because I wanted to hear it that way. Sorry, just been bored with this whole thing.
My full name is Uncle Capt. "Skipper" Dumbchops and I seem to have misplaced my electric pretzel sharpener.
Re: New Blue Soap - The MONO Edition [2022] - January 3rd Update
Hey Dumbchops. Understandable, what you say. Does that mean then, that the mono version has been abandoned? Fair enough, if so - it's a massive load of work. Thanks for everything you have done.
-
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:29 pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: New Blue Soap - The MONO Edition [2022] - January 3rd Update
I agree with Mr Bump and want to post my massive thanks for the great work you've done on all these sets Robert