As usual, so precise and so clear.
We have this expression in French that summarizes it "monk's labor!"
As usual, so precise and so clear.
What a brilliant and clear reprecentation.
Moptop wrote: ↑Wed Oct 20, 2021 11:49 amOh that's fine ... actually I'm looking for suggestionsmaul wrote: ↑Mon Oct 18, 2021 9:43 am a graphic recap of Get Back compilation sources:
What a brilliant and clear reprecentation.
It is embarrassing to ask a question / make a suggested change, but absolutely no disrespect intended.
Under Compilation 1 you have included the E69742 / 'Sunday' Acetate material , which contains somewhat different material. So when looking at the final table it shows 1. WBCN , Acetate, and Tape rows , but it is not the same material.
Is it worth separating it out as 1b or 1.5, to highlight the alternate tracks? With possible acetate and tape sources.
Hopefully, with a GB Acetate being sold last year there will be a new source for compilation #2 in the near future.
If I got it, I sum up too much don't highlighting comp 1,5 and you suggest to create another new row for 1,5
actually I had made other additional charts to explain better compilations details, i.e:
adding a 1,5 row improve precision but somewhat confuses a little ...I'm puzzled