Peter Jackson and The Star Club Tapes.

Discuss official releases and re-issues. The only links allowed here are to the Beatles YouTube channel or other band-sanctioned platforms.
Bazilnerk
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon May 31, 2021 2:24 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Peter Jackson and The Star Club Tapes.

Post by Bazilnerk »

Lord Reith wrote: Sat Jul 22, 2023 12:57 am The original would probably play fine if it were baked first. It could also be cleaned with isoprople alcohol. I have a machine which is like a video cassette rewinder and cleans a videotape, so don't see why it wouldn't work for audio.
You can't do that with this tape. It may even be acetate based - i'm not sure what the actual tape on the reel is. - if it is baking would melt it. The only tapes that need baking are those that were made with synthetic oil from the 70's onwards. Baking an earlier tape usually achieves nothing and should only be done if really necessary, with tapes that suffer SSS (Like Ampex reels from the 70's) as it does actually harm the tape in the long term. Isopropyl alcohol can help, but only if the tape backing isn't too fragile. As this is thin tape, it's the backing that's the problem, not the oxide. Both Baking and Alcohol will help bind the oxide back to the backing. If the backing is disintegrating, then you're stuffed. - Read Dr Richard Hess's writings on the subject - The man who first discovered baking tapes and still is the world expert.

The problem with the original tape is not age, it's over use. Williams used to play the original to anyone who wanted to hear it rather than making a safety copy and using that. It's thin tape and has broken many times over the years (hence jumps you hear in some songs). You will find that some earlier bootlegs don't have the jumps that appear on later versions. These were copied prior to the damage. Larry's engineer was no fool. If it could have been transferred after baking, it would have been done. It is simply just too fragile. I suppose it's possible that if the tape were to be somehow reinforce, it might be playable. But i've never heard of that being done. The best remaining source is the complete set of 7.5ips copy reels made in 1976. If memory serves me right, they copied 2 tracks at a time on to stereo tape just to cut down on the number of times the original would have to be played, as it was starting to look fragile even then. Thin tapes are not meant to be constantly played, they will wear out.

I specialise in archive transfers and have baked and transferred hundreds of reels, but would NEVER bake a reel that didn't require it and have never had to bake a reel from earlier than about 1973/4.
Lord Reith wrote: Sat Jul 22, 2023 12:57 am
Now not to wantonly disagree with the experts, but i do have a problem with this. I've seen a very long document written by Barber where he goes into fine detail about everything at the club but at no point does he mention a suspended microphone. Also, listening to the tape it seems to me that the microphone position changes between sets. Also, it seems to be off to one side and picking up John's amp more than George's, which is a problem if it were suspended from the ceiling. And if it's hanging from the ceiling, why can't we clearly hear the sound of people talking on the dance floor? Everyone sounds a long way away, like the mic were tucked away somewhere unobtrusive. I also have a problem with the notion of the recorder being left permanently to the side of the stage. I own a Philips EL3541 machine and it is a bloody good recorder, and makes fantastic quality recordings even at 3&3/4ips. In 1962 it cost the equivalent of 1000 pounds, and it is not something you'd just leave lying around for anyone to pinch or spill beer all over. If I had just bought that machine, I would guard it with my life. It'd be straight back under lock and key at the end of the day. It seems more likely to me that it came out only occasionally, and for a specific reason. I sure as hell would not be comfortable leaving any piece of extremely expensive gear of mine in the unnattended company of rock musos, not for a second. I think it is easy for Ted to say it was just left lying around for anyone to use when they wanted, but it's more like an easy quote and doesn't ring true to me.

Also I might point out that the EL3541 came with a free 5 inch reel of Philips double play tape, capable of recording 64mins on each of the four tracks. So I suppose this is the actual tape that the recordings are on and the "Philips" reel in the photos is the original and the "BASF Magnetophband" box is from somewhere else. The Philips tape came in a light blue box.
Correct the box the tape is in has nothing to do with the original reel, which is probably, as you say, what came with the recorder. I think Ted suggested this was the case too. Hans would remember.

Ted's memories weren't always that reliable and Hans has quoted him from several interviews where he says where the recorder was, but it could simply be that he didn't remember exactly after so many years. The tape shows that it was recorded on many occasions, not just the odd night. With some bits being recorded over and lots of stops and starts, which does give weight to the story that anybody could switch it on and off. But it may only have been used when Ted was around, but then I doubt the digs Ted was in were any safer than the club for keeping the recorder at than at the club!

Mic placement - we can only go by recollections. But I suppose it could have been moved around by Barber or Taylor trying to find the best spot.
User avatar
Kwai Chang
Posts: 1572
Joined: Tue May 25, 2021 3:46 am
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 191 times

Re: Peter Jackson and The Star Club Tapes.

Post by Kwai Chang »

The tapes are in the exact state that destiny needs them to be in.
The story is dependent on their existence and as such, the condition of it is part of the story.
It cries out loudly about the things that matter: Situations, circumstances, opportunity, logistics, proof, patriotism, civilized war, art, music, bravery, sacrifice...and more. The tape itself exists and is genuine. The ragged good fortune is on its last leg as capstans and pinch rollers go. From the actual; audio, we get to hear that at least 5 people were hip. Those cats at the Star Club are fitting in with the toughest of crowds. They are doing it in slang German and attracted the hippest locals. We get to hear the non-musical side of international diplomacy. Everyone is having fun. And we can hear a definite charm starting to develop. But, Germany's gifts to the group must now mature or distill. That will take another year. But, we can hear the sacrifice and the confidence has germinated. Thank you Ted Taylor!
The function of the Star Club tape has not been diminished in any way.
KC
malvis_b
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2022 11:50 am

Re: Peter Jackson and The Star Club Tapes.

Post by malvis_b »

well.....if Now and Then has been cleaned up using AI, someone could think of cleaning other songs and make something like
the one below
georgefromhenley
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 6:22 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Peter Jackson and The Star Club Tapes.

Post by georgefromhenley »

Bazilnerk wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2023 10:07 pm
Lord Reith wrote: Sat Jul 22, 2023 12:57 am The original would probably play fine if it were baked first. It could also be cleaned with isoprople alcohol. I have a machine which is like a video cassette rewinder and cleans a videotape, so don't see why it wouldn't work for audio.
You can't do that with this tape. It may even be acetate based - i'm not sure what the actual tape on the reel is. - if it is baking would melt it. The only tapes that need baking are those that were made with synthetic oil from the 70's onwards. Baking an earlier tape usually achieves nothing and should only be done if really necessary, with tapes that suffer SSS (Like Ampex reels from the 70's) as it does actually harm the tape in the long term. Isopropyl alcohol can help, but only if the tape backing isn't too fragile. As this is thin tape, it's the backing that's the problem, not the oxide. Both Baking and Alcohol will help bind the oxide back to the backing. If the backing is disintegrating, then you're stuffed. - Read Dr Richard Hess's writings on the subject - The man who first discovered baking tapes and still is the world expert.

The problem with the original tape is not age, it's over use. Williams used to play the original to anyone who wanted to hear it rather than making a safety copy and using that. It's thin tape and has broken many times over the years (hence jumps you hear in some songs). You will find that some earlier bootlegs don't have the jumps that appear on later versions. These were copied prior to the damage. Larry's engineer was no fool. If it could have been transferred after baking, it would have been done. It is simply just too fragile. I suppose it's possible that if the tape were to be somehow reinforce, it might be playable. But i've never heard of that being done. The best remaining source is the complete set of 7.5ips copy reels made in 1976. If memory serves me right, they copied 2 tracks at a time on to stereo tape just to cut down on the number of times the original would have to be played, as it was starting to look fragile even then. Thin tapes are not meant to be constantly played, they will wear out.

I specialise in archive transfers and have baked and transferred hundreds of reels, but would NEVER bake a reel that didn't require it and have never had to bake a reel from earlier than about 1973/4.
Lord Reith wrote: Sat Jul 22, 2023 12:57 am
Now not to wantonly disagree with the experts, but i do have a problem with this. I've seen a very long document written by Barber where he goes into fine detail about everything at the club but at no point does he mention a suspended microphone. Also, listening to the tape it seems to me that the microphone position changes between sets. Also, it seems to be off to one side and picking up John's amp more than George's, which is a problem if it were suspended from the ceiling. And if it's hanging from the ceiling, why can't we clearly hear the sound of people talking on the dance floor? Everyone sounds a long way away, like the mic were tucked away somewhere unobtrusive. I also have a problem with the notion of the recorder being left permanently to the side of the stage. I own a Philips EL3541 machine and it is a bloody good recorder, and makes fantastic quality recordings even at 3&3/4ips. In 1962 it cost the equivalent of 1000 pounds, and it is not something you'd just leave lying around for anyone to pinch or spill beer all over. If I had just bought that machine, I would guard it with my life. It'd be straight back under lock and key at the end of the day. It seems more likely to me that it came out only occasionally, and for a specific reason. I sure as hell would not be comfortable leaving any piece of extremely expensive gear of mine in the unnattended company of rock musos, not for a second. I think it is easy for Ted to say it was just left lying around for anyone to use when they wanted, but it's more like an easy quote and doesn't ring true to me.

Also I might point out that the EL3541 came with a free 5 inch reel of Philips double play tape, capable of recording 64mins on each of the four tracks. So I suppose this is the actual tape that the recordings are on and the "Philips" reel in the photos is the original and the "BASF Magnetophband" box is from somewhere else. The Philips tape came in a light blue box.
Correct the box the tape is in has nothing to do with the original reel, which is probably, as you say, what came with the recorder. I think Ted suggested this was the case too. Hans would remember.

Ted's memories weren't always that reliable and Hans has quoted him from several interviews where he says where the recorder was, but it could simply be that he didn't remember exactly after so many years. The tape shows that it was recorded on many occasions, not just the odd night. With some bits being recorded over and lots of stops and starts, which does give weight to the story that anybody could switch it on and off. But it may only have been used when Ted was around, but then I doubt the digs Ted was in were any safer than the club for keeping the recorder at than at the club!

Mic placement - we can only go by recollections. But I suppose it could have been moved around by Barber or Taylor trying to find the best spot.
I'd like to quote my own book as the "side of the stage" quote sounds to many ears as if it was on a table in front of the stage - it wasnt:

"Taylor planned to record his band (Kingsize Taylor and the Dominoes) to check out how they sounded. But as the tape was available to anybody who wanted to press the button it is likely that it ran over and over. The machine was positioned “between the stage and the dressing room in the back area where the artists would go”638, while a Sennheiser microphone hung from the ceiling of the club. In a different statement he explained: “Adrian set up a microphone suspended from the ceiling about 26 feet (ca. 8m) from the ground and about 100 feet (ca. 30m) from the centre of the stage. This microphone was then connected directly to the tape recorder which was placed on a table located in the wings immediately adjacent to where the
group members would access the stage from the dressing room.”639

638 Quote by Kingsize Taylor from the StarClub Tapes hearing, May 6th, 1998
639 Signed witness statement that was compiled by the solicitors Kanaar & Co to be used in court, dated March 19th, 1998"

As for the louder guitar of John - no one said the mic hang exactly in the middle - so perhaps the left side of the stage with Johns amp was nearer to the mic - or John just pushed the volume of his amp....
User avatar
Lord Reith
Posts: 4696
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:22 am
Location: BBC House
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 4083 times

Re: Peter Jackson and The Star Club Tapes.

Post by Lord Reith »

Whatever the state of the recording, I doubt we'll ever get a complete release of it. More like a set of the best sounding dozen songs. Some of the recordings could potentially sound very good where they have strong vocals (ironically the two Fascher tracks have the loudest vocals) and bass. But some of them (sadly nearly always the most rocking and impressive ones) have extremely distant vocals and bass. You can just about pull bits of them out of the maelstrom but they are highly elusive, like trying to ctach a slippery fish in your hands. In kansas City, the vocals during the last part of the song are right on the threshold of audibility. I can't see any technology short of some yet-to-be-invented quantum wonder-algorithm getting a clean vocal out of that. In Peter's interview he was saying he wanted it to sound like a studio recording. With the current and forseeable technology, that is still a pipedream. And yet a lot of fans are expecting this to be the case. MAL is just a demixing algorithm like any other, albeit a very good one. It can't turn poorly recorded sounds into well recorded ones.
Women there don't treat you mean, in Abilene
User avatar
Lord Reith
Posts: 4696
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:22 am
Location: BBC House
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 4083 times

Re: Peter Jackson and The Star Club Tapes.

Post by Lord Reith »

Ted says in that youtube interview a couple of pages back that they would record the whole 8 hour nights because you could tape 8 hours on one tape at low speed. That recorder in fact has only one speed - 3&3/4 - and with the double play 5inch reel he was using the maximum time was 4 hours 24min. You CAN get 8 hours by using a 7 inch doubleplay tape but there is no evidence they did (unless they did and it was lost!) The machine came with a 5 inch double play tape so it seems that's all they used.

I just thought I'd point this out because it illustrates that his memory was hazy and prone to invention regarding this stuff.
Women there don't treat you mean, in Abilene
User avatar
WOA76
Posts: 742
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2021 2:27 am
Has thanked: 272 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Peter Jackson and The Star Club Tapes.

Post by WOA76 »

So the mic MAYBE on George side of the stage then ?
Attachments
IMG_5276.jpeg
IMG_5276.jpeg (141.94 KiB) Viewed 902 times
IMG_5277.jpeg
IMG_5277.jpeg (282.93 KiB) Viewed 902 times
IMG_5278.jpeg
IMG_5278.jpeg (1.09 MiB) Viewed 902 times
Chris
User avatar
Lord Reith
Posts: 4696
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:22 am
Location: BBC House
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 4083 times

Re: Peter Jackson and The Star Club Tapes.

Post by Lord Reith »

WOA76 wrote: Wed Jul 26, 2023 2:21 am So the mic MAYBE on George side of the stage then ?
No, too close. The mic sounds about 10 metres away. Certainly not 30 metres.
Women there don't treat you mean, in Abilene
User avatar
WOA76
Posts: 742
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2021 2:27 am
Has thanked: 272 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Peter Jackson and The Star Club Tapes.

Post by WOA76 »

Lord Reith wrote: Wed Jul 26, 2023 10:11 pm
WOA76 wrote: Wed Jul 26, 2023 2:21 am So the mic MAYBE on George side of the stage then ?
No, too close. The mic sounds about 10 metres away. Certainly not 30 metres.
and the thing is THIS recording sound GREAT compare some Beatles stuff
I think mice moved were every they wanted to just a thought cause this always sound so clear....

""""When Adrian Barber recorded the Beatles during their New Year appearance at the Star Club at the close of 1962, Horst could be heard singing 'Hallelujah, I Love Her So,' although he is uncredited on the album 'The Beatles Live! At the Star Club In Hamburg, Germany, 1962.' His brother Freddie also got up on stage to sing 'Be-Bop-A-Lula', but he is credited as Herr Obber, which means 'Mr Waiter' in German.""

A Man Called Horst
By Bill Harry [Harry would know]
http://www.triumphpc.com/mersey-beat/be ... orst.shtml
Chris
User avatar
WOA76
Posts: 742
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2021 2:27 am
Has thanked: 272 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Peter Jackson and The Star Club Tapes.

Post by WOA76 »

things you find :)

Always cool see colour photos from Star Club
Meet The Beat - The Beatles, Tony Sheridan And The Beat Brothers –
https://www.discogs.com/master/599995-T ... t-The-Beat
Attachments
R-8158358-1651262754-4694.jpg
R-8158358-1651262754-4694.jpg (91.75 KiB) Viewed 625 times
R-4440244-1364930119-5084.jpg
R-4440244-1364930119-5084.jpg (131.27 KiB) Viewed 627 times
Chris
Post Reply