Page 4 of 4
Re: The She Loves You edits laid bare
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2022 8:52 am
by Lord Reith
Engonoceras wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 2:27 am
There's that one website that claims the backing tracks are from the same sessions but if people want to believe that nonsense that's their problem.
Wow, fake She Loves You news!
Re: The She Loves You edits laid bare
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2022 6:02 pm
by Dave1971
Lord Reith wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 8:52 am
Engonoceras wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 2:27 am
There's that one website that claims the backing tracks are from the same sessions but if people want to believe that nonsense that's their problem.
Wow, fake She Loves You news!
Yeah, that's the one I was refering to. Never bought into the same backing track theory though.
Re: The She Loves You edits laid bare
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 2:09 am
by Lord Reith
Dave1971 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 6:02 pm
Lord Reith wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 8:52 am
Engonoceras wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 2:27 am
There's that one website that claims the backing tracks are from the same sessions but if people want to believe that nonsense that's their problem.
Wow, fake She Loves You news!
Yeah, that's the one I was refering to. Never bought into the same backing track theory though.
Years ago I did a fake stereo She Loves You by synching up the backing track from SLD to SLY. Now, normally synchronising two different sources of the same performance is child's play. But that job was a NIGHTMARE. They don't stay in synch for more than one or two seconds. And also when you hear one in each ear, the differences in the performances are obvious. The parts for SLY changed gradually as 1963 wore on and moved into 1964. SLD has all the hallmarks of the way they played SLY in 1964.