beatlegdb.com

Posted: **Thu Nov 04, 2021 1:00 pm**

kolive wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:09 pm
maul wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:46 am
This is that chart, extended :

Great table, thanks.

oops, no matter

but comment on compilations should be longer and less equivocal:
> Compilation 2: Unfinished assembly. All new mixes. Get Back and Two Of Us presents unique mixes. New take of Let It Be, longer Dig It, shaky DAP intro
> Compilation 3a: (shaky DAP intro), Two Of Us new mix, Get Back single mix, final edit of Dig It, chat edited in between LIB and TLAWR

Posted: **Thu Nov 04, 2021 2:18 pm**

While searching for info and/or possibilities to listen to the original Wizardo bootleg Let It Be 315 on the internet, I came across this youtube link:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=bx0S1YCrCSY

which, unfortunately, is blocked from being played in my country and probably in all the other 60 countries where UMG is present. This somehow suggests that somebody else found out that Let it Be 315 is exactly the same as the (Japanese) Get Back. I might be wrong. Does anybody here have a digital copy of the original Let It Be 315?

Posted: **Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:05 pm**

maul wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:46 am
kolive wrote: ↑Wed Nov 03, 2021 11:24 pm Thanks Maul, these tables are really useful (as memory doesn't stick as well as it used to).
I was also thinking of the really simple table you made a few days ago with the version numbers running
on the left vertically.
This is that chart, extended :

Fantastic -- thank you maul!

Posted: **Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:53 pm**

tulirepo wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 2:18 pm While searching for info and/or possibilities to listen to the original Wizardo bootleg Let It Be 315 on the internet, I came across this youtube link:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=bx0S1YCrCSY

which, unfortunately, is blocked from being played in my country and probably in all the other 60 countries where UMG is present. This somehow suggests that somebody else found out that Let it Be 315 is exactly the same as the (Japanese) Get Back. I might be wrong. Does anybody here have a digital copy of the original Let It Be 315?

is this any help?

https://www.beatleg.online/let-it-be-315

Posted: **Thu Nov 04, 2021 4:20 pm**

Mrbeatleg wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:53 pm
tulirepo wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 2:18 pm While searching for info and/or possibilities to listen to the original Wizardo bootleg Let It Be 315 on the internet, I came across this youtube link:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=bx0S1YCrCSY

which, unfortunately, is blocked from being played in my country and probably in all the other 60 countries where UMG is present. This somehow suggests that somebody else found out that Let it Be 315 is exactly the same as the (Japanese) Get Back. I might be wrong. Does anybody here have a digital copy of the original Let It Be 315?

is this any help?

https://www.beatleg.online/let-it-be-315

We’ll soon revise that page

Posted: **Thu Nov 04, 2021 8:06 pm**

Mrbeatleg wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:53 pm [
is this any help?

https://www.beatleg.online/let-it-be-315

Hello! Thanks!
The answer is twofold:
- in terms of information content: yes, the page is very helpful (yet, I had found the page one before).
- in terms of listening experience, less so.

Posted: **Fri Nov 05, 2021 3:07 am**

I don't understand how the Tonto/Yellow Dog can be from an acetate and Thirty Days from a tape. What is going on there?

Posted: **Fri Nov 05, 2021 6:30 am**

Lord Reith wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 3:07 am I don't understand how the Tonto/Yellow Dog can be from an acetate and Thirty Days from a tape. What is going on there?

Are We 100% sure the Tonto lp was from acetate?

Posted: **Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:46 am**

LFSDoc wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 6:30 am
Lord Reith wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 3:07 am I don't understand how the Tonto/Yellow Dog can be from an acetate and Thirty Days from a tape. What is going on there?
Are We 100% sure the Tonto lp was from acetate?

Well mine was very scratchy, but it could have just been a bad pressing. It seems extraordinary that exactly the same oddball version of the album would turn up from tape source. Unless it wasn't tape at all and was just very well declicked.

Has anybody actually GOT a rip of the 1985 Tonto lp? I have never seen a rip.

Posted: **Fri Nov 05, 2021 9:21 am**

Lord Reith wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:46 am
LFSDoc wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 6:30 am
Lord Reith wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 3:07 am I don't understand how the Tonto/Yellow Dog can be from an acetate and Thirty Days from a tape. What is going on there?
Are We 100% sure the Tonto lp was from acetate?
Well mine was very scratchy, but it could have just been a bad pressing. It seems extraordinary that exactly the same oddball version of the album would turn up from tape source. Unless it wasn't tape at all and was just very well declicked.

Has anybody actually GOT a rip of the 1985 Tonto lp? I have never seen a rip.

I’ll try and make a n/d over the weekend

beatlegdb.com

Wrong Masters for the ‘Glyn Johns 1969 Mix’, and Japan came to rescue.

Re: Wrong Masters for the ‘Glyn Johns 1969 Mix’, and Japan came to rescue.

Re: Wrong Masters for the ‘Glyn Johns 1969 Mix’, and Japan came to rescue.

Re: Wrong Masters for the ‘Glyn Johns 1969 Mix’, and Japan came to rescue.

Re: Wrong Masters for the ‘Glyn Johns 1969 Mix’, and Japan came to rescue.

Re: Wrong Masters for the ‘Glyn Johns 1969 Mix’, and Japan came to rescue.

Re: Wrong Masters for the ‘Glyn Johns 1969 Mix’, and Japan came to rescue.

Re: Wrong Masters for the ‘Glyn Johns 1969 Mix’, and Japan came to rescue.

Re: Wrong Masters for the ‘Glyn Johns 1969 Mix’, and Japan came to rescue.

Re: Wrong Masters for the ‘Glyn Johns 1969 Mix’, and Japan came to rescue.

Re: Wrong Masters for the ‘Glyn Johns 1969 Mix’, and Japan came to rescue.