Lord Reith wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 8:48 am
One for Peter Jackson?
Tee hee hee!
This stuff doesn't happen randomly!
Sutcliffe's true essence will prove itself to be mercurial and well worth serious sterling when the smoke clears!
Wasn't his cultural importance woven into everything he touched? I mean, should we place him far above Van Gogh in terms of sheer consistency? If he was not an art student until 1957, then Stuart was a savant super sonic fantastique! C'est chic! That comparison might seem a wicked distortuion, but Van Gogh might have influenced my life...vaguely. Sutcliffe's pieces will tally huge capital in a few years. It's just now, being realized that he mastered every medium he ever dabbled in. Don't forget, the art of bass guitar as destiny,..
or, fräulein as canvas...
or, 21 years old as meteor!
It's a miracle that he didn't cut off his plectrum/brush finger!
Jackson IS the likely local lad and as investments go, this one is still affordable!
It's returns will vector through exponents of intellectual magnitude on a powers of 10 viagra parallel.
Now, if PJ becomes connected, the collection could be protected and exploited in ways we would probably appreciate!
It's not far fetched...it's a very cool prospect.
Peace, Sire!
KC
